① 求一篇美国军事思想英文论文带翻译，1000字即可
Since the September 11 attacks, a number of websites, books, and films, largely promoted on and distributed through the Internet, have challenged the mainstream account of the attacks. Although mainstream media has stated that al-Qaeda "conspired" to execute the attacks on the World Trade Center in the legal sense, a 9/11 conspiracy theory generally refers to a belief in a broad conspiracy, in which the attacks were executed by powerful groups often including government agencies or an alleged secret global network. Many groups and indivials challenging the official account identify as part of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Initially, 9/11 conspiracy theories received little attention in the media. In an address to the United Nations on November 10, 2001, United States President George W. Bush denounced the emergence of "outrageous conspiracy theories ... that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty. Later, as media exposure of conspiracy theories of the events of 9/11 increased, US government agencies and the Bush Administration issued refutations to the theories, including a formal response by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to questions about the destruction of the World Trade Center, a revised 2006 State Department webpage to debunk the theories, and a strategy paper referred to by President Bush in an August 2006 speech, which declares that terrorism springs from "subcultures of conspiracy and misinformation," and that "terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories. The distortions keep alive grievances and filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices and self-serving propaganda.
In August 2004, a Zogby International poll indicated that 49.3% New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens "overall" say US Leaders "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act. In July 2006, a Scripps Howard and Ohio University poll concluded that "Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them", "sixteen percent said it's "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings" and "twelve percent suspect the Pentagon was struck by a military cruise missile in 2001 rather than by an airliner captured by terrorists. A May 2006 Zogby International poll indicated that 42% of Americans more likely agree with people who believe that "the US government and its 9/11 Commission concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks, saying there has been a cover-up. A September 2006 Ipsos-Reid poll found that 22 percent of Canadians believe "the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden and were actually a plot by influential Americans. An October 2006 New York Times and CBS news poll showed that 28 percent believe members of the Bush Administration are mostly lying about "what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States.
Just prior to the fifth anniversary of the attacks, a flurry of mainstream news articles on 9/11 conspiracy theories were released. In its coverage Time Magazine stated, "This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality. Mainstream coverage has generally presented these theories as a cultural phenomenon and is often very critical of their content.
Immediately following the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. government said the attacks were carried out by members of the terrorist organisation al-Qaeda, headed by Osama Bin Laden. On the morning of September 11, the government said, nineteen terrorists hijacked four commercial airplanes by using knives, box cutters, pepper spray and fake explosives. They piloted the planes themselves and crashed these into the World Trade Center and The Pentagon. According to mainstream scientific account, the World Trade Center towers later collapsed e to the impact damage, removal of the fire protection and the intense fires. Due to the collapse of World Trade Center One and Two, surrounding World Trade Center buildings were heavily damaged as well, leading in turn to their complete or partial collapse. United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania later that day after passengers heard of the previous attacks in air phone and cell phone conversations and brought the plane down.
Soon after the 9/11 attacks, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and FEMA concted building performance studies at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The Intelligence Committees of the House of Representatives and the United States Senate concted a Joint Inquiry in 2002. U.S. government officials, such as Condoleeza Rice, said they had no advance knowledge of the attacks and no idea that such a thing might happen. Organizations representing the victims' families such as the Jersey Girls demanded further investigation and, after initial reluctance, the administration acceded to their request. The bipartisan 9/11 Commission was formed tasked with “not placing indivial blame” but providing an explanation as to what happened and making recommendations to prevent a recurrence. In 2004 the commission released its report. It disclosed that there were prior warnings of varying detail that the United States would be attacked by al-Qaeda. These were ignored, the report said, e to a lack of communication between various law enforcement and intelligence personnel. For the lack of interagency communication, the report cited bureaucratic inertia and laws passed in the 1970s to prevent abuses that resulted in major scandals ring that era. The report also faulted both the Clinton and the Bush administration with “failure of imagination”. The explanation laid out in the report has been endorsed by most members of both major political parties, and is what conspiracy theorists refer to as "the official account" of the September, 2001 attacks, which only focuses on government sources.
In addition to government investigations and sources that comprise the "official account" that conspiracy theorists look to, the September 11, 2001 attacks have been documented and analyzed by numerous non-government sources. These include eyewitnesses, investigations by the National Fire Protection Association and other organizations, experts at Pure University and Northwestern University, and news media throughout the world, including Al Jazeera, The Times of India, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), the BBC, Le Monde, Deutsche Welle,the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), and The Chosun Ilbo of South Korea.
===============================================================
自从九一一事件，出现了许多网站，书籍和电影，在很大程度上促进了对散发，通过互联网有挑战主流帐户的攻击。虽然主流媒体曾表示，盖达组织的"阴谋" ，实施袭击的世界贸易中心，在法律意义上说， 9 / 11阴谋论，一般是指一种理念，在一个广泛的阴谋，在该袭击事件被枪决强国集团常常包括政府机构或被指控秘密的全球网络。许多团体和个人挑战官方帐户查明的一部分9 / 11真理运动。
最初， 9 / 11阴谋论，并未获得重视，在媒体。在一个地址向联合国提交的关于2001年11月10日，美国总统布什谴责了出现"惊人的阴谋论… …所以，企图诿过于远离恐怖分子本身，使之远离有罪，后来正如媒体曝光的阴谋论的事件9 / 11增加，美国政府和人民对布什政府发出了驳斥，以理论，其中包括正式的回应，由国家标准与技术研究院（ NIST ）提出的关于销毁世界贸易中心， 2006年修订的国务院网页揭穿理论，以及一份战略文件中提到，布什总统在2006年8月发表讲话，宣称恐怖主义泉水，由"亚文化的阴谋和误报" ， "恐怖分子招募更有效地从民众的了解世界，是由被污染的不实之词和腐蚀的阴谋理论。扭曲永葆怨气和滤出的事实，将挑战流行的偏见和自我服务的宣传。
2004年8月，佐格比国际民意调查显示， 49.3 ％的纽约市居民，并有41 ％的纽约公民"整体"说，美国领导人"事先知道袭击计划或靠近2001年9月11日，他们自觉地失败以法，在2006年7月，斯克里普斯霍华德和俄亥俄大学的调查结论认为， " 36 ％的受访者总体说，这是"非常可能"或"有点可能"联邦官员要么参加了这次袭击事件对世界贸易中心和五角大楼还是没有采取任何行动阻止他们" ， " 16 ％的人表示，它的"非常可能"或"有点可能"崩溃的双子塔在纽约的资助，由炸药偷偷放置在该两栋建筑物" ， " 12 ％疑犯五角大楼被一个军事巡航导弹， 2001年，而不是由人民客机被恐怖分子。一2006年5月佐格比国际民意调查显示， 42 ％的美国人更可能同意的人认为， "美国政府和它的9 / 11委员会隐瞒或拒不查处临界相反的证据，他们官方的解释，对911恐怖袭击事件，称有一直隐瞒事件真相的行动。 2006年9月，这份-里德民调发现，约有22 ％的加拿大人认为， "对美国的袭击于2001年9月11日，已完全与拉登被其实是一个阴谋，由有影响力的美国人。一个2006年10月，纽约时报和哥伦比亚广播公司新闻调查结果显示，有28 ％的人认为议员对布什政府大多是谎称"他们知道自己有哪些之前， 2001年9月11日，大约有可能发生的恐怖袭击事件是针对美国的。
只是事先向第五周年的攻击，一系列的主流新闻文章9 / 11阴谋论，就被释放。在它的涵盖范围时代杂志指出， "这不是一个附带现象，它是一个主流的政治现实。主流覆盖率已普遍把这些理论作为一种文化现象，往往是非常关键的内容。
在紧接2001年9月11日袭击事件后，美国政府表示，袭击事件是由成员组成的恐怖组织盖达，为首的奥萨马。当日上午9月11日，政府说， 19名恐怖分子劫持了4家商业飞机用的刀，美工刀，胡椒喷雾及假炸药。他们驾驶的飞机本身并坠毁，这些融入世界贸易中心和五角大楼。根据主流科学帐户，世界贸易中心大楼倒塌后，由于冲击损坏，拆除消防保护和激烈的火灾。由于倒塌的世界贸易中心一，二，围绕世界贸易中心大厦受到严重破坏，而且，反过来又导致他们完全或部分倒塌。美国联合航空公司的93航班坠毁在宾夕法尼亚州当天稍晚后，乘客听说过以前的攻击在空中电话和手机交谈，并把飞机上下来。
不久9 / 11恐怖袭击，美国土木工程师协会（ asce ）和联邦紧急措施进行建设绩效的研究，在世界贸易中心和五角大楼。情报委员会的众议院和美国参议院进行了联合调查，在2002年。美国政府官员，如国务卿赖斯说，他们没有事先了解该攻击和不知道有这样的事情可能会发生。组织代表受害者家属，如新泽西州女孩，要求进一步调查，在经过最初的犹豫，政府加入了他们的要求。两党9 / 11委员会成立专责" ，不把个人的责任" ，而是提供一个解释，至于到底发生了什么提出建议，以防止同类事件再次发生。 2004年，该委员会公布了它的报告。据透露，有事先警告的不同细节，声称美国将攻击的盖达组织。这些被漠视，报告说，由于缺乏沟通，各执法机构和情报人员。因为缺乏机构间的沟通，该报告引述的官僚惯性，并通过的法律，在20世纪70年代，以防止滥用，导致重大丑闻，在那个时代。该报告还断陷都克林顿和布什政府"失败的想象" 。解释了在报告中已得到大多数议员的两个主要政党，是有什么阴谋论者指为"正式户口"的9月， 2001年袭击，其中仅着重于政府的消息。
此外，以政府的调查和来源构成的"正式户口"阴谋理论家期待， 2001年9月11日恐怖活动被记录在案，并分析了众多非政府来源。这些措施包括目击证人，案件现正由美国国家防火保护协会和其他组织，专家，在美国普渡大学和西北大学，和新闻媒体，在全国各地，世界各国，包括卡塔尔半岛电视台，印度时报，加拿大广播公司（央行） ，英国广播公司，世界报伊彻韦勒，澳大利亚广播公司（ ABC ）的，和朝鲜日报，韩国。
===========================================================================================
The Enlightenment of the Iraq war
First, win the war and lose credibility. The end of major combat in Iraq, as the United States and Britain overcome with depression have "intelligence gate" political crisis. Because there is no mandate from the United Nations, the United States and Britain was fought say, and tried to find evidence after the "supplementary proceres." But after the war, the United States and Britain in Iraq Wade overnight did not identify relevant evidence, and in fact there a lot of the United States and Britain intelligence authorities used false evidence to mislead the community, both Bush and Blair are in the country encountered considerable trouble. Faced with the recent anti-war demonstrations, Blair had been in a silent, Bush is strong on fighting terrorism, the Iraq and terrorism-linked, but it still attempts to adopt the beginning, the war was no longer mentioning the reason.
Second, split the Western alliance, the United States and Britain even more isolated. Before the Iraq war started, in the international context has emerged, led by the United States and Britain to the Warring States and France and Germany at the core of anti-war countries. Both the concept of deep differences over the attitude of the firm and after the Second World War were unprecedented in the Western camp. Spain recent political change in the situation after the general election, Spain from the Warring States into the war, the other main European attitude of the Warring States Period Poland began wavering, and the two factions fighting over the momentum of change has emerged. .
Third, it could not extricate Ho talk about democracy. United States wants to turn Iraq turned into an American-style a model of democracy, thereby transforming the entire Arab world. However, the United States in the reconstruction process of Iraq's political structure in the event of severe difficulties. In Iraq, the color of the most secular political forces that the Saddam regime had, the United States now to kick Saddam Hussein, according to the United States want to build a model of the secular Turkish government, asking for the impossible a little taste. If the United States by the end of June this year the transfer of sovereignty to the Iraqi people, really do not know what will happen situation. Normally, the religious factor will become the dominant political process in the spirit of the main factors, but also the United States should want to see. By the end of June this year, is a threshold, a look at the United States is still Yingkang themselves away in the end.
Fourth, the "anti-terror" war, trigger more terrorist. To the United States into the war in Iraq is part of the war on terror, but many countries and people are not recognized. In fact, the post-war Iraq itself has become a breeding ground for terrorist acts and the source of the world's terrorist activities have spread trend. Some commentators have suggested that, even if the "base" no longer has direct application of the ability of terrorist actions, but it has become the spirit of global terrorism and ideological sources. "Base" is the ideology of widely disseminated. This situation with the war in Iraq have great relations with the Bush instigated the clash of civilizations "crusader" remarks have relations, and this is the beginning of the new century, a very dangerous sign.
Fifth, the traditional Western values are being challenged. "9.11" incident that the United States will "terrorism" was established as the most important task, and the war in Iraq makes this idea deeper cut into its social dimensions. Airport Rulindadi the United States, the implementation of the Immigration foreigners from taking pictures and fingerprints of their citizens have to accept all complex inspection at the same time, the United States visa foreigners increasingly difficult. This kind of national and citizens of other countries restrictions and violations of the rights issue, has caused a certain degree of rebound in the community, the strength of anti-war peace also gain some energy. To a certain extent, the war in Iraq has eroded the value of the West's political philosophy and political ecology, the development of the situation and consequences deserve close attention.
In short, for the United States, the war in Iraq has only solved the problem of the surface of the fall of Saddam Hussein, but to the political reconstruction, the clash of civilizations, the international community separatism, terrorism rampant, deep-seated problems, the loss appropriately, in the past and the future time will continue to be the topic of debate.
伊拉克战争的启示
其一，赢了战争，输了诚信。在伊拉克主要战事结束之后，作为战胜者的美英两国却同陷“情报门”政治危机。因为没有得到联合国的授权，美英于是打了再说，并试图在事后找到证据“补办手续”。然而战后，美英在伊拉克挖地三尺也没找出相关证据，反倒出现了不少美英当局用不实情报误导社会的证据，布什和布莱尔均在国内遇上相当大的麻烦。面对近日的反战示威，布莱尔已陷入沉默，布什还在强谈反恐，强把伊拉克和恐怖主义挂钩，但也开始顾左右而言它，不再提当初开战的理由了。
其二，西方阵营分裂，美英更加孤立。伊拉克战争还没打响之时，在国际范围内就出现了以美英为首的主战国和以法德为核心的反战国。二者的理念分歧之深，态度之坚决，均是二战后西方阵营中前所未有的。最近西班牙大选后出现政治变局，西班牙从主战国变为反战国，另一个欧洲主战国波兰也开始态度游移，战和两派的气势之比又出现变化。。
其三，抽身都难，何谈民主。美国想把伊拉克搞成一个美式民主的样板，进而改造整个阿拉伯世界。但美国在重建伊拉克政治结构的过程中遇上了极大困难。在伊拉克，最具世俗主义色彩的政治力量原本就是萨达姆政权，现在美国把萨达姆踹了，又想按美国模式建一个土耳其式的世俗主义政府，有点缘木求鱼的味道。如果美国今年6月底移交主权给伊拉克人，真不知会出现什么局面。按常理，宗教因素将成为主导政治进程的主要精神因素，但这又是美国绝不愿看到的。今年6月底是个坎，且看美国是抽身而去还是硬抗到底。
其四，“反恐”战争，引发更多恐怖。美国力求把伊拉克战争算成反恐战争的一部分，但许多国家和人民对此不认可。事实上，战后的伊拉克本身已成为一个恐怖主义行为的滋生地和策源地，世界上的恐怖主义活动也有蔓延之势。有论者认为，即使“基地”组织不再具有直接实施恐怖行动的能力，但它已成为全球恐怖主义的精神和思想来源。“基地”组织的意识形态正广泛传播。这种情况同伊拉克战争有绝大的关系，同布什鼓动文明冲突的“十字军”言论也有关系，这是新世纪之初一个很危险的迹象。
其五，西方传统价值观受到挑战。“9·11”事件使美国将“反恐”确立为第一要务，而伊战则使这一理念更深地切入到其社会的各个层面。美国机场如临大敌，对入境外国人实施拍照和提取指纹，本国公民也要接受种种繁复的检查，与此同时，外国人赴美签证越来越难办。这种对本国和他国公民进行权利限制和侵犯的问题，已经引起了一定的社会反弹，和平反战的力量也从中获得一定的能量。从某种程度上说，伊拉克战争已经侵蚀了西方国家的政治价值理念和政治生态，这一情况的发展及后果值得密切关注。
总之，对美国而言，伊拉克战争只解决了萨达姆倒台的表层问题，却带来政治重建、文明冲突、国际社会分裂、恐怖主义猖獗等深层问题，其得其失，在今后一个不短的时间内仍会是人们争论的话题。
② 这些中文参考文献怎么翻译成英文
[1] 王聪．需求工程的形式化方法[J]．军事通信技术，2008，（1）.
Wang cong. [1] as the formalization ways of requirements engineering [J]. Journal of military communication technology, 2008, (1).
[2] 赵天行，罗军，魏薇．基于框架视图应急救援系统需求工程建模研
[2] Zhao Tianhang Luo Jun, wei wei. View based on the framework of emergency rescue system requirements engineering modeling research
究[J]．科技资讯，2010，（9）.
Investigate [J]. Journal of information science and technology, 2010, (9).
[3] 姚冉．开源软件开发中的需求工程[J]．信息与电脑( 理论版)，
[3] yao ran. Open source software development of requirements engineering [J]. Journal of information and computer (theory),
2010，（3）.
2010, (3).
[4] 吴明珠，徐俊．基于CMMI 的需求工程实施方法研究[J]．软件,
[4] pearl wu jun xu. Requirements engineering implementation method based on CMMI study [J]. Journal of software,
2009，（1）.
2009, (1).
[5] 戴昌裕，杨增强．软件需求工程中常见问题及解决办法[J]．软件,
[5] Dai Changyu zeng-qiang Yang. Common problems and solutions in software requirements engineering [J]. Journal of software,
2009，（3）.
2009, (3).
[6] 李德毅．需求工程——对复杂系统的软件工程的基础研究[J]．中
[6] de-yi li. Requirements engineering, the basic research of software engineering of complex system [J]
国基础科学，2009，（2）.
The basic science, 2009, (2).
[7] 梁正平，明仲，毋国庆．多视点需求工程中视点集成过程的研究[J].
[7] Liang Zhengping MingZhong, no National Day. Multiple viewpoints of requirements engineering point of view the integration process of research [J].
计算机科学，2009，（8）.
Computer science, 2009, (8).
[8] 喻超，毋国庆．基于问题域与视点代理的需求工程研究[J]．计算
[8] YuChao, no National Day. Based on the problem domain and viewpoint agent requirements engineering research [J]. Journal of computing
机工程与科学，2006，（1）.
Machine engineering and science, 2006, (1).
[9]林云．需求工程原理在软件开发中的应用[J]．软件，2008，（2）.
[9] Lin Yun. Requirements engineering principle in the application of software development [J]. Journal of software, 2008, (2).
③ 参考文献的英文翻译
人们处理信息的方式有两种： （一）系统的控制和（ b ）自动。控制信息处理中使用新型的情况下，很少有以往的经验回落的。这里的信息是积极争取和认真处理，使高品质的决定。这种类型的决策往往是定性为“合理” （ SIM卡与Cioia ， 1986年） 。模型的合理决策，如期望理论（隆， 1964年）往往在工作以及会计行为的非例行的情况（例如，选择了职业生涯） ，但不那么在试图解释日常行为，如持续的性能水平（ 基翁 ， 1983 ） 。一旦积累经验，尤其决定或任务，系统决策过程让位给依赖于自动程序使用建立心智模式和套路。首次厨师准备一盘涉及非常不同的信息处理时间比100 。心智模式的组织知识系统的方式是架构。架构组织经验有意义的方式，并有可能为人们处理含糊不清的练习方法和预测未来会发生什么。如果人们有经验，旅游，营销或损坏的控制，有架构的规划访问，引进新产品，或突发性坏消息。一旦形成模式，有少审查目前的事实和情况，并更多地依靠什么是已知的。
合同是一种架构开发的经验。它可能会产生的控制，合理的程序（例如，什么是在这对我来说，有什么证据可以表明我可以信任的另一方） ，但一旦建立，合同变得更加自动化。新来的资产负债表和退伍军人心理公司展示了两套不同的模式（合同）并存的基础上是否被聘用的人在20世纪70年代或90年代。由于是一个伟大的趋势继续合同，人民的架构形式稳定和预测未来的行为。人们不一定努力改变模式。人民艰苦奋斗的拟合经验到它们。变更校董会被通过镜头的每一个成员的合同搁置
④ 英文的参考文献格式到底怎么写
英文引用及参考文献格式要求如下：
参考文献(即引文出处)的类型以单字母方式标识,具体如下:
M——专著C——论文集N——报纸文章
J——期刊文章D——学位论文R——报告
对于不属于上述的文献类型,采用字母“Z”标识。
对于英文参考文献,还应注意以下两点:
①作者姓名采用“姓在前名在后”原则,具体格式是:姓,名字的首字母.
如:MalcolmRichardCowley为:Cowley,M.R.,
如果有两位作者,第一位作者方式不变,&之后第二位作者名字的首字母放在前面,姓放在后面,
如: FrankNorris与IrvingGordon应为:Norris,F.&I.Gordon.;
②书名、报刊名使用斜体字,如:MasteringEnglishLiterature, EnglishWeekly。
(4)军事英文翻译参考文献扩展阅读：
参考文献类型及文献类型，根据GB3469-83《文献类型与文献载体代码》规定，以单字母方式标识：
1、专著M ； 报纸N ；期刊J ；专利文献P；汇编G ；古籍O；技术标准S ；
2、学位论文D ；科技报告R；参考工具K ；检索工具W；档案B ；录音带A ；
3、图表Q；唱片L；产品样本X；录相带V；会议录C；中译文T；
4、乐谱I； 电影片Y；手稿H；微缩胶卷U ；幻灯片Z；微缩平片F；其他E。
(4)军事英文翻译参考文献扩展阅读来源：网络_参考文献
⑤ 求：英文参考文献及其翻译一篇
人工湿地是为了净化污水而建造的一类系统，其环境特征既不同于自然湿地内，也不同容于一般陆地生境。人工湿地的生物多样性是一个新问题。作者以杭州植物园作为案例研究了亚热带地区人工湿地植物多样性的季节变化。结果表明：秋末人工湿地的物种数为72种，其中自然迁入植物54种；冬春季的物种数为46种，其中自然迁入物种33种。在人工湿地中，人工配置的植物种类仍然是群落结构的主体，迁入植物人部分处于伴生地位。应该在人工配置植物的基础上保留一些有价值的自然迁入植物，使人工湿地具有较高的生物多样他，这样既能充分吸收水中的多种营养成分，又能美化环境。亚热带地区可以有冬春和夏秋两个植物功能群在人工湿地中连续生长，这可以充分利用时间生态位，提高人工湿地在冬季的净化效果，增强人工湿地净化能力的季节间稳定性。
参考资料：http://info.cqvip.com/asp/vipsearch.asp
⑥ “参考文献”翻译成英文怎么说谢谢
REFERENCE 和BIBLIOGRAPHY 都可以 具体看你参考文献方面有没有详细列明出处的第几页几段,如果明确的 那么用BIBLIOGRAPHY,反之用REFERENCE
⑦ 求助英文参考文献的翻译格式~~~
外文参考书目的格式如下：
编号，作者（英文名字在前，姓在后，中间是教名专，可属以缩写或不写姓名；如果只有一个作者，亦可先排姓，加“,”再排名，通常不写教名；若多个作者，排在后面的名字需要使用缩写格式），书名，地名: 出版单位，版次，年份 。
根据这个原则翻译外文参考书目。
翻译出来的参考书目按以下格式编排：
编号，作者名，《书名》，出版单位，年份和版次。
希望我的回答可以对你有帮助。
⑧ 这些参考文献怎么翻译成英文
中文参考文献要翻译成英文吗：是在甚么场合使用？如果是发表在中文刊物，无需翻译参考文献，翻译篇名、摘要和关键词就能够了。如果是对外学术交换，应当把论文全篇包括参考文献都翻译为英语。
⑨ 有做军事论文翻译的吗
军事论文翻译的话，你可以去找些翻译公司看看，推荐Unitrans世联翻译公司你参考下的，他们在中国与国家外文出版局、外交部翻译室、中国国际广播电台、中央民族语文翻译局、空军海军翻译室、北京外国语大学、北京第二外国语学院、解放军外国语学院、北京语言大学、世界500强驻华企业等机构的近1000名同传译员、资深翻译、语言教授、海归博士、外籍译审建立了长期的合作关系。 具体军事论文翻译的问题的话，建议你直接咨询下他们吧。
⑩ 英文的参考文献翻译成中文
这个专业性太强了...
专业术语外行人表示看不懂
网络建设方向的么？...