Ⅰ 如何理解和處理校長教師學生的角色
校長和老師是上下級的關系，就是你以後走上社會要面對的關系。教師和學生不存在這種利益的沖突，關系很清，就是一個教，一個學，這是你現在最應該盡情享受而且長大以後再也不會有的感覺。校長和學生沒有直接關系，他只是通過老師在管理你。
Ⅱ 公辦大學，校長或者負責人對高考學生有破格錄取的權力嗎
大學的錄取工作是一個嚴格的過程，校長肯定是沒有這個權利的，這是違法違紀的。
Ⅲ 校長如何處理體罰學生的教師(3)
事實上，只有那些對學生造成嚴重傷害的案例才會為媒體所關注，顯然它們只是冰山一角。對於體罰，學校、教師、家長和學生的態度都是比較復雜的。作為一種傳統的教育手段，盡管法律是禁止的，只要不出現嚴重的後果，並不會引起媒體與公眾的廣泛關注，學校一般是容忍或者默認的;教師對體罰的態度雖不一致，但多數教師都認為教育不能沒有懲罰;家長大都認為，只要不造成孩子身體上的傷害，適當的體罰未嘗不可;大部分學生覺得對那些破壞紀律、擾亂課堂的學生是需要懲罰的，否則影響大家，懲罰的手段則可以是罰掃地、跑步等。
Ⅳ 請求校長處理毆打、侮辱老師的學生(聯名)
這個從法律上說 屬於民事案件 民事案件有一個特點 民不舉 官不糾 意思就是 挨打的老師沒有報案 那麼其它人就無權報案 且其它人報案公安局不會受理
那麼 在回到問題本質 與其寫信還不如直接去找校長更震撼
Ⅳ 中學的校長打了本校的學生該如何處理
到教育局去舉報，煽動相關學生罷課。要有理有據，要不卑不亢。
必要時寫成書面材料或者影像資料寄到上一級紀委、監察部門、政府辦、教委或者教育局，分管該校范圍的副縣（區）長，在各大熱門論壇、當地縣區論壇、教育論壇上面發帖子，頻繁的發，造成較大的聲勢。
在本校中物色一些人證，另外根據孩子傷情，到醫院看病後必須保留診斷書、醫葯費票據，包括未上學的情況，情緒發展情況，都要收集人證物證。如傷情嚴重，要到公安處報警，報案處理，你捂著害怕得罪校長，最後你孩子倒霉。
這樣這個校長肯定內心恐懼，嘴上即使還牛碧，心理已經發虛，可能找中間人來撮合調解，息事寧人。底下就看你的態度了。
1、按照以上的辦法，把事情搞大，狠狠的懲罰這個校長，讓他不得安寧。但你做好孩子轉學的准備，肯定不在這里上了。
2、如果孩子沒有傷，就是調皮被校長輕輕的肢體接觸了一下，那麼我建議你找校長見個面，相當於禮貌的警告他一下，讓他狗爪子自重一點，不要侮辱人民教師的稱號。就算了。忍氣吞聲只是為了孩子好上學。還有個損點辦法，就是找兩個人瞅准機會修理一下這傢伙。不要傷筋動骨，嚇唬一下即可。
Ⅵ 高校校長要求處理提問題學生，具體是什麼情況
山東一高校出現了一些學生提意見的事情，或者說這個提意見的方式可能不太合理，反正最終造成的結果就是校方認為這個學生有聚眾鬧事的嫌疑，要處理他，但是現在網路這么發達，事情很快就曝光到了網上。
現在從網上看到的幾起事例上來看都是一個趨勢，就是學生在學上發生什麼樣的事情，指望學生自己的力量，跟學校去周選，顯然是不現實的，但是這件事情一旦被曝光到網上，很快就會引起很多人的關注，然後校方就會以飛快的速度把這些問題解決，並且給大家一個交代。但是到底是怎麼解決的，為什麼這么快了，效率就這么高了，誰也不知道。
Ⅶ 假如你是學校校長,談談你將如何處理違紀學生,並陳述理由.用英文作答
Thank you, Madam President, Honorable judges, ladies and gentlemen, friends of each other dialectically, hello. For political affairs, business, debate dialectical nature to relate to. Today, our position is clarified the truth, the truth is the law of objective things and their correct understanding, the so-called debates are based on a certain foundation for the rules of logic, through the facts and reason things different ways and communicate opinion , confrontation, and that is clear and lucid prescribed. Clarified the truth to say the truth at the debate with other idea more clear to understand. Human history is the pursuit of truth, to explore the truth and the dissemination of truth, and then out of ignorance, ignorance, stupid history. We love the truth and revere the truth, as Aristotle said: "To Sir With Love, I love truth more." However, the process of understanding the truth has not always been smooth, it is a process. In this process, the debate is an essential aspect, people in order to seek the truth, it is necessary to argue with ignorance, with the bias debate, to the unknown challenges, and the absurd struggle, contend with the same power. As the saying goes: do not knock drums do not ring, the rationale does not argue unknown. People in long-term course of the pursuit of truth, it is recognized that the truth more debates to clarify the truth. Of course, we do not deny that the practice of exploring the truth and for testing the truth of the great role. It is a necessary condition, but we believe that the debate is to specify a sufficient condition for the truth.
First, Know the truth, the debate can make a one-sided to Know from comprehensive, from vague to clear, from shallow to deep. Universe all things running, and numerous laws to hide behind the appearance at the need for us to explore, to the inspection center. However, the level of awareness is limited, is the so-called non-person knowledge of Health, the Practice without confusion. So, people argue to discern true and false, with dialectic to decide the truth and falsehood. In the dialectical process, the truth graally from infancy to maturity.
Second, the spread of the truth process, the dialectic can be grasped by the majority of people. Insights generated, the habits and prejudices that have long stood on the front of it, their strength was so powerful that the truth initially only by a handful of people to master. A single spark can start a prairie fire but, as in ancient Rome, the Li said: "the fire of truth, sometimes dim, but it will never be extinguished." Truth and fallacy of the argument to the truth will eventually win ended, but the truth light will illuminate the whole of humanity. Thank you everyone. (Applause)
Thank you Cui classmates below, please us one side of the first representative of Student position, his time is 3 minutes.
One side of dialectical: good afternoon everyone. World War II, when the English said: "I am fighting for the truth." Germany also said: "I am fighting for the truth." Even the French people also said: "I am the truth for you!" Everybody Say the words. The results are what we have found the truth? Truth is thousands of dead bodies lying on the ground you! Bacon said: "The study of truth and understanding of truth and trust the truth, that people are the most noble virtues." Truth is the essence of objective things and their correct understanding of the law, it can be divided into subjective and objective truth, I feel that the President very handsome, This is a subjective truth. The Earth around the sun, this is only the objective truth. Dialectical just an act, not the law, which is based at two or more opposing opinion above. Friends of each other guilty of the most dialectical We regret the error is equivalent to a certain dialectical are good, reasonable, saying that the truth is the dialectic, but in real life are like the dialectical嗎? (Applause) is clearly not right. Today I want to talk and our words of war, the Battle of ink is the performance of the dialectic. Clarified the situation and refers to the truth from the local to the whole, from the relative to the absolute distillation of the whole process continuously.
The truth will not clarified the situation.
Reference: http://www.3yw.net/Article/20056.html